An autopsy of the silent son, by Stephanie Shaakaa

There is a particular kind of dust that settles on the shoulders of boys in the reddish grit of laterite roads or the soot from generator fumes and danfo exhaust. It is something slower, heavier, almost invisible at first glance. The residue of days is noticed often, but never fully seen.

To move into Lagos at dawn is to see wheelbarrows pushed through Balogun Market while traders are still untangling their wares. Apprentices sleep on wooden benches inside mechanic workshops in Ojuelegba. Small figures hawk pure water between traffic at Ikeja. Children crouch beside generators in Mushin, breathing fumes that settle deeper than memory.

In Ladipo market, a boy too young for what he is holding lifts an engine part with both hands, not because he is strong, but because no one else is there to help him. Nearby, another child crosses burning asphalt to buy fuel in a plastic container. Childhood is irrelevant to danger. At some point, if one looks without looking away, it becomes clear that these are not simply children working. They are children who have been absorbed into the machinery of survival. We have learned to pass them without disruption. That is how it continues.

We have even developed language that protects our comfort. We say apprenticeship. We say hustle. We say early exposure to trade. These words are spoken softly, though they carry no softness. What is truth, exposure without protection. What we often mean is simpler. A boy has been placed into labour before he has been allowed to understand rest as something he is entitled to.

We have become comfortable with the boy child as utility. If he can carry engine blocks in Ladipo, if he can hawk water under Oshodi bridge, he is resourceful. If he can endure hunger through a full day in a workshop in Aba without complaint, he is disciplined.

But if he pauses, if he hesitates, if his body simply asks for rest, he becomes a problem to the system that depends on his silence. We admire endurance in him, but forget to ask what it costs.

In the suburbs, rest becomes waste because there is always a trade to learn. In Benin, emotion becomes weakness because machinery does not pause for feeling. Even imagination begins to feel like a luxury that cannot be afforded. Slowly, boyhood is rewritten into something harder than it was meant to be. Survival is not becoming.

We are building boys who are expected to become fortresses before they have learned to become human. Yet a fortress is not alive. It is built for siege. And over time, even the idea of softness begins to disappear from inside them.

The deeper danger is not only economic. It is internal.

We are raising boys who become fluent in labour and illiterate in themselves. They learn how to fix engines in Ladipo before they learn how to name fear. They learn how to negotiate spare parts in Computer Village before they learn how to speak disappointment. They learn how to absorb work without knowing how to process humiliation when no one is watching.

And something begins to fracture quietly.

We see the result later in life, though we rarely trace it back. In the man in Lagos traffic who cannot sit comfortably with silence. In the father who provides everything except presence. In the young man who can close deals in Computer Village but cannot stay alone with his own thoughts. In the emotional distance that follows many men like a second skin.

We call it discipline. But often it is simply what remains of a childhood where feeling too much was never safe.

There is one moment that captures how more than theory even can.

A boy in Lagos traffic, no older than twelve, runs between moving cars with a sack of water pressed against his chest. The light is about to change. Horns are rising. The traffic is thick with the noise of the city. He is not thinking about the next sale, the next load, the next moment of avoidance.

At the last second, a hand reaches out and then remembers quickly what smiling does not feed him.

He is not an idea yet. He is not a symbol. He is just a child learning how to survive a day that keeps moving faster than him.

And we pass him.

We have built a society where what we see repeats as no longer interrupts us. It becomes background. It becomes normal. We have built a system of high definition infrastructure and low resolution compassion.

Yet if one stays long enough in these quiet fractures, past the unstable hum of generators that now feel more permanent than electricity, there are still moments that refuse to disappear.

A boy in Surulere laughing loudly for a second before remembering seriousness.

A child in Onitsha staring too long at something he cannot afford, then walking away too quickly.

An apprentice in Aba pausing mid task as if childhood briefly returned, then finding no place to stay.

These moments are small, but they matter because they reveal something important. Nothing here is naivety. Everything is shaped. Everything is taught. And what is taught can, in principle, be changed.

The boy child is not a problem to be fixed with slogans or sympathy. He is a reflection of what we have decided to tolerate. In him, we see not only poverty, but priorities. Not only survival, but design.

And if we are honest, we already understand this design well. We know what it means to praise productivity while neglecting personhood. We know what it means to celebrate boys who never cry, who wonder why grown men cannot speak. We know what it means to confuse usefulness with worth.

So the question is not whether we understand. The question is whether we are willing to interrupt what understanding has already made comfortable.

And perhaps that is what makes today’s International Day of the Boy Child uncomfortable in ways we rarely admit. Because beyond the hashtags, themed conferences and carefully worded speeches lies a quieter truth. A society cannot claim to celebrate its boys while simultaneously normalizing the conditions that slowly erase their childhood in plain sight.

Because a society that continues to look at its boys and see only what they can carry will eventually produce men who can carry everything except themselves.

And when that happens, it will not announce itself loudly.
It will arrive quietly.
As distance in fathers.
As silence in sons.
As absence in homes where presence is expected but no longer felt.
And long before we name it as a crisis, it will already have become normal.

Vanguard Ndews

The post An autopsy of the silent son, by Stephanie Shaakaa appeared first on Vanguard News.