ARTICLE AD BOX
Etemore Glover
Nigeria’s impact‑investing ecosystem faces a stark paradox: a wide gap between the values it professes and the capital it actually allocates. In the Impact Investors Foundation (IIF) release of the Inclusive Capital Scorecard: GESI Baseline Survey, 91 percent of investment stakeholders say they align with Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) and Gender‑Lens Investing (GLI) frameworks. On paper, everyone agrees that empowering women and marginalized groups benefits business and development. Beneath that consensus, however, lies a 50‑percentage‑point gap between stated intent and institutional practice.
The GESI Baseline Report shows that only 41 percent of Nigerian investment institutions have formal GESI policies. Worse, none of the enabler institutions surveyed—accelerators, incubators, and enterprise support organisations—report a dedicated GESI budget line. The ecosystem therefore prizes inclusion rhetorically while leaving it unfunded.
This inertia carries a heavy economic cost. Nigeria faces a $6.75 billion financing gap in gender‑lens capital. Of the $8 billion needed to drive inclusive growth over the next decade, only $1.25 billion (15 percent) has been mobilised, and just 11 percent of that capital comes from domestic sources. The country relies heavily on foreign development partners, while domestic institutional investors remain largely inactive. The capital shortfall is mirrored by a leadership ceiling: among fund managers, DFIs, and capital providers, women occupy only 22 percent of investment decision‑making roles, short of the 40 percent target. Inclusion drops precisely where capital decisions are made.
To break these structural barriers, Nigeria must treat GESI as a core investment practice and an economic imperative, not as a CSR add‑on or PR exercise. The solution lies in adopting and executing the GESI Roadmap, a strategic framework that operationalises inclusion through three pillars.
First, the SPEDACC model—Nigeria’s definitive framework for advancing gender‑lens investment—has been adopted. It moves beyond voluntary GESI add‑ons and integrates four critical ecosystem segments: the Supply Side (SP) of capital providers such as financial institutions, fund managers, and DFIs; Enablers (E) comprising intermediaries like accelerators, incubators, enterprise support organisations, and government ministries that create an enabling environment; Demand Side Actors (DA) of private enterprises, entrepreneurs, and youth‑ or PwD‑led businesses seeking capital; and the Cross‑Cutting (CC) segment that brings together all stakeholders to break ecosystem silos.
These segments are linked by three cross‑cutting pillars—Accountability (A), Coordination (C), and Capacity (C). By embedding mandatory disclosure frameworks, fostering cross‑sector coordination, and dismantling restrictive social norms, the SPEDACC model turns GESI commitments into measurable outcomes, positioning Nigeria as a continental leader in inclusive finance while mitigating risks of structural inequality and social unrest.
Second, the roadmap applies Market Systems Thinking. It recognises that barriers women and marginalized groups face—cultural norms, property rights, lack of collateral—are deeply interconnected. Fixing capital access requires a composite policy framework, not isolated programmes.
Third, the Roadmap demands measurable accountability, moving the ecosystem from vague, performative targets to legally binding capital allocations and institutional mandates.
Transitioning from intent to implementation cannot rely on goodwill alone. Voluntary commitment has reached its structural limit. Without aggressive policy advancement and regulatory enforcement, Nigeria risks a state of “shallow adoption,” where GESI remains symbolic rather than impactful. The federal government, through bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), must move beyond endorsement to active enforcement.
This requires embedding GESI metrics directly into fiscal and monetary policies. The government should introduce robust market incentives, such as targeted tax reliefs for fund managers achieving gender parity, specialised credit guarantees for inclusive funds, and dedicated concessional lending windows for women‑led MSMEs. Policy must also mandate gender‑responsive budgeting—currently adopted by only 16 percent of institutions nationwide—and formal institutional safeguards to structurally eradicate inequality.
Addressing the data deficit is also critical. A lack of harmonised, sex‑disaggregated data undermines rigorous decision‑making and obscures the true ROI of inclusive investing. By mandating global reporting standards such as IRIS+ metrics or the 2X Criteria, Nigerian regulators can improve market transparency, boost international investor confidence, and de‑risk the sector.
Nigeria sits at a critical demographic and economic crossroads. With Africa’s largest population, the country under‑utilises half of its productive capacity. The choice is between a demographic dividend and a demographic liability. Continued inaction will deepen regional disparities, suppress GDP growth, and fuel social unrest that thrives on exclusion.
Conversely, fully institutionalising the GESI Roadmap would position Nigeria as a continental leader in inclusive finance. Moving from performative commitments to binding regulatory policy and concrete budgetary action is not merely a moral choice—it is the definitive economic strategy to unlock billions in dormant capital and build a resilient, stable, and truly prosperous nation.
*Etemore Glover is the Chief Executive Officer, Impact Investors Foundation.

4 hours ago
1













![Peller engaged Jarvis, hints at wedding amid pregnancy rumours [VIDEO]](https://dailypost.ng/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/447497.jpg)

English (US) ·