Court dispute ignites over Anioma traditional stool in Ebonyi community

A new dispute has arisen over the traditional leadership of Anioma Autonomous Community in Isuokoma, Onicha Local Government Area of Ebonyi State.

Kingship claimant Wisdom Chukwuma Okoye has petitioned the court to nullify the recognition of the community’s current traditional ruler.

After the Monday hearing in Abakaliki, Okoye told reporters that the process that produced the present monarch was marred by irregularities and breaches of the established succession rules.

He traced the conflict to a long‑standing kingship quarrel that once left Anioma without a traditional ruler for about 19 years.

According to Okoye, the prolonged dispute has denied the community developmental opportunities and government benefits that are linked to a functioning traditional institution.

He maintains that Anioma follows a rotational system among designated villages and compounds, and that it was his lineage’s turn to supply the monarch.

“The kingship of Anioma rotates from village to village, and this time it is our turn. Instead of allowing due process to take its course, some people allegedly manipulated the process and conducted what I call a kangaroo election,” Okoye said.

He alleged that the local government chairman at the time had notified security agencies and government authorities that no election would be held because of the prevailing situation in the community.

Okoye said that despite this directive, some individuals proceeded with an unauthorized process and later crowned another person as king.

He said that rather than resort to actions capable of disrupting peace in the community, he chose the legal route.

“I decided not to take the law into my hands because I believe the court remains the last hope of the common man,” he added.

Okoye further alleged that government authorities were misled into recognizing the disputed traditional ruler and issuing him a staff of office.

According to him, the state government was allegedly informed that there was no dispute pending over the kingship matter.

“They deceived the government into believing there was no case and that everything had been settled amicably,” he alleged.

Lead counsel for the claimant, Barrister Cee Cee Ani, argued that no valid eze‑ship election was conducted in the community.

Ani said the local government authorities had earlier cancelled the proposed election because of security concerns in the area.

The lawyer cited several security incidents, including the alleged abduction of a traditional leader and killings within the community, as factors behind the decision.

According to him, only two individuals, including Chief Wisdom Okoye, were duly screened and cleared to participate in the proposed election before its cancellation.

“Our position is simple: there was no election in Anioma Isu. If there was no election, then any subsequent recognition arising from that process cannot stand,” Ani stated.

The counsel further claimed that the individual currently recognized as traditional ruler had previously been disqualified from the process, adding that his client’s legal team is seeking a court order directing the conduct of a fresh election.

“Our prayer before the court is for a lawful election to be conducted and for the process to follow due procedure,” he said.

The matter is currently before the State High Court, with parties awaiting judicial determination on the disputed kingship and recognition process.

Efforts to obtain responses from the other parties mentioned in the allegations were not immediately successful as of the time of filing this report.

However, the case has been placed on accelerated hearing and further adjourned to June 18, June 29, and July 13, 2026, for the claimant to call witnesses to prove his case.